Reputation is a Leadership Outcome: Reflections on Trust, Tone and the Culture-Brand Connection

Indigenous Knowledge

Reputation is not a communications product—it is a leadership outcome. Drawing from the 2025 Axios Harris Poll and its Canadian counterpart, this article reflects on how brand trust is formed not only by public-facing actions but by the internal tone leaders set. Through comparative insights between U.S. and Canadian brand perception, it explores how trust is built, how it breaks down, and what it demands of leadership. For HR professionals, the message is clear: internal culture and external brand reputation are inextricably linked. Integrity inside the organization shapes perception outside it—and in today’s climate, that connection is more critical than ever.

Organizations we partner with

Bata Shoe Museum, Canadian Council for the Arts, CEE Centre for Young Black Professionals, City of Toronto, David Suzuki Foundation, Fasken, Genome Canada, George Brown College, GTAA, Humber, IMCO, Kids Help Phone, Luminato, McMaster University, MLSE, OICR, Ontario Presents, ROM, Sankofa Square, Sick Kids, TD Bank, TTC, UHN Foundation, United Way Greater Toronto, University of Toronto, University of Waterloo, University Pension Plan Ontario, York University

Clients Served Include

Opening Thoughts

The 2025 edition of the Axios Harris Poll 100 has once again prompted a collective scan of North America’s most trusted brands ("The 2025 Axios Harris Poll 100 reputation rankings," 2025). As always, the list provides more than a snapshot of market dominance—it offers a mirror, reflecting how people feel about the institutions they interact with and depend on.

But as I studied the rankings, my focus shifted from who was listed to why. Why do some brands consistently earn trust, while others lose it after a single stumble? What lies beneath consumer confidence and loyalty? And crucially: What role does leadership play?

1 Brand Reputation: More Than Marketing

In both the U.S. and Canadian editions of the Harris Poll, companies are evaluated across dimensions such as trust, vision, growth, product quality, culture, ethics, and citizenship. These are not surface-level impressions. They are the structural elements of organizational identity—what I call the ‘rooms of the house.’ A weak foundation in any one of them threatens the integrity of the whole.

In 2025, Trader Joe’s topped the U.S. list, while in Canada, brands like the Professional Women’s Hockey League and Canadian Tire ranked highly ("The 100 Most Canadian Brands," 2025). Meanwhile, multinationals such as Apple, Microsoft, and Toyota remain top performers in both countries, suggesting that while brand resonance is locally nuanced, its underlying structure—built on consistency and ethical alignment—is universal.

Too often, we treat reputation as a marketing function, delegated to communications teams or agencies. But that view is outdated. According to Deloitte’s Global Human Capital Trends ("Global Human Capital Trends," 2025), a majority of executives consider ‘purpose’ and ‘trust’ to be critical to their company’s success—yet only a minority say these are reflected in how their organization operates. That gap is telling.

2 Trust as a Cultural and Leadership Signal

Reputation, then, begins far from the headlines. It is formed internally—through the choices leaders make, the tone they set, and the culture they shape. And it is confirmed externally—through how those internal dynamics show up in the world.

The Edelman Trust Barometer found that a majority of consumers now choose or boycott a brand based on their beliefs and values ("Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Report," 2023). Employees are increasingly doing the same, gravitating toward organizations that live their stated commitments. This means that corporate ethics, culture, and leadership behaviour are no longer private matters—they are central to public perception.

A brand cannot claim inclusion while cultivating exclusion. It cannot promise transparency while decision-making remains opaque. It cannot tout innovation while silencing dissenting voices. The dissonance between what is said and what is experienced is not only noticeable—it’s reputationally fatal.

3 The Role of HR in Reputation Management

For human resources professionals—especially those supporting senior leadership—the connection between internal culture and external brand is not abstract. It is strategic. It is measurable. And it is immediate.

Every decision about recruitment, promotion, discipline, and communication contributes to the organization’s ethical footprint. A toxic culture cannot be covered with a glossy ad campaign. Employee review sites, social media, and internal whistleblowing have made it impossible for organizations to control the narrative if the reality doesn’t match.

Several years ago, McKinsey reinforced this point: among those who quit their jobs, the top reason cited was not compensation—but lack of respect and trust in leadership. In other words, the internal experience is now a driver of brand loyalty, not just among consumers but also among talent ("‘Great Attrition’ or ‘Great Attraction’? The Choice is Yours," 2021).

HR’s role, then, is pivotal in shaping and protecting that experience. It requires a commitment to cultural coherence, leadership development, and values alignment at every level of the organization.

4 What Sustains Trust Today

What, then, earns and sustains brand trust in 2025?

  • Consistency between word and action. Trust is lost when promises are broken—even subtly.

  • Purpose beyond profit. Consumers and employees expect companies to contribute to social well-being, not just shareholder value.

  • Cultural integrity. Ethical values must be embedded, not aspirational. They must show up in everyday practice.

  • Leadership presence. Leaders must be visible, accountable, and empathetic. Silence or spin in the face of crisis erodes trust faster than the crisis itself.

The organizations that appear on trust rankings year after year are not flawless. But they are consistent. They align intention with execution. They are as focused on how they lead as on what they deliver.

Conclusion: Leadership as the Echo Chamber of Reputation

Reputation is not the job of a single department. It is not confined to press releases or campaign slogans. It is the cumulative result of leadership tone, cultural integrity, and operational alignment. It is an outcome—earned slowly, lost quickly.

In an age of increasing transparency, scepticism, and employee voice, leaders must recognize that their internal tone echoes externally. Culture is no longer invisible. Trust is no longer implicit. And brand loyalty is no longer guaranteed.

If we want to understand why some organizations top the Harris Poll while others fall off, we must look inward. The question is not just what the public sees—but what employees experience every day. How they are treated. How they are heard. How leadership shows up.

Because at its core, reputation is not just what people say about your brand.It’s how people experience your leadership.

Bibliography

The 100 Most Canadian Brands. (2025). Retrieved from https://theharrispoll.com/briefs/the-100-most-canadian-brands/

The 2025 Axios Harris Poll 100 reputation rankings. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.axios.com/2025/05/20/axios-harris-poll-company-reputation-ranking

Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Report. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2023-03/2023%20Edelman%20Trust%20Barometer%20Global%20Report%20FINAL.pdf

Global Human Capital Trends. (2025). Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/human-capital-trends.html#introduction

‘Great Attrition’ or ‘Great Attraction’? The Choice is Yours. (2021). McKinsey Quarterly. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/great-attrition-or-great-attraction-the-choice-is-yours

Add a comment

This will be publicly visible.

Your email address will not be published.

Your comment will be reviewed by an admin before it is published.

Related Posts

Continue exploring practical insights and perspectives from the BES team.

  • Talent Acquisition / Jason Murray

    Tips for Landing the Candidate: What Every Employer Must Know Once the Decision’s Made

    In this article, Jason Murray explores the pivotal final phase of executive and senior leadership recruitment: converting your chosen candidate into a confirmed hire. He outlines nine high-impact practices that go beyond negotiation tactics and into the realm of leadership stewardship—ensuring the offer stage reflects the values, clarity, and credibility of your organization. Designed for hiring teams, executives, and search partners, this article serves as a timely reminder that the way you close sets the tone for everything that follows.

    Read Tips for Landing the Candidate: What Every Employer Must Know Once the Decision’s Made
  • Future of Work / Chad Lawrence

    The Rise of the Four-Day Workweek: Assessing the potential of a four-day work week and its impact on productivity, job satisfaction, and overall organizational culture

    The four-day workweek is gaining traction globally as organizations seek innovative ways to improve productivity, enhance job satisfaction, and foster inclusive workplace cultures. By prioritizing quality over quantity, this model has shown promising results, such as increased productivity and improved work-life balance, as evidenced by successful pilots at companies like Microsoft Japan and Perpetual Guardian. Beyond productivity, the four-day workweek supports equity, diversity, inclusion, and accessibility (EDIA) by addressing diverse employee needs, such as caregiving responsibilities and work-related stress, while signaling a progressive shift in organizational culture. However, its implementation requires careful planning to avoid overburdening employees or creating disparities between roles. When managed effectively and evaluated through measurable metrics and an EDIA lens, the four-day workweek has the potential to redefine workplace norms, positioning organizations as forward-thinking, people-centered, and adaptive to modern workforce expectations.

    Read The Rise of the Four-Day Workweek: Assessing the potential of a four-day work week and its impact on productivity, job satisfaction, and overall organizational culture
  • HR Corner / Erica Ing

    Providing Feedback: A Manager’s Guide

    Feedback is a powerful tool for fostering employee growth, development, and performance. To be truly effective, it must be delivered thoughtfully, with care, and respect for the individual. In diverse workplaces, where employees come from various cultural, ethnic, and personal backgrounds, feedback should go beyond performance metrics to create a sense of trust, belonging, and motivation. This guideline is designed to help you provide feedback that is clear, specific, and actionable, while also aligning with Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (EDIA) principles. By doing so, you ensure that all employees receive fair, supportive guidance that promotes their development and strengthens the inclusivity of your team and organization.

    Read Providing Feedback: A Manager’s Guide
  • HR Corner / Stephanie La

    The Burnout Divide: Examining Stressors and Solutions in Diverse Workplaces

    Workspaces today—whether onsite, remote, or hybrid—present unique challenges that contribute to stress and burnout among employees. Onsite workers often face high-pressure environments and struggle with work-life balance, compounded by the need for visible productivity. Remote workers, while enjoying flexibility, grapple with blurred boundaries, extended working hours, and isolation from colleagues. Hybrid models blend flexibility and connection but still require careful structuring to address employee needs. The key to mitigating burnout lies not in choosing a specific work model but in fostering a supportive environment tailored to diverse employee experiences. By offering mental health resources, promoting clear boundaries, and encouraging open communication, organizations can prioritize well-being and create a workplace where employees thrive, regardless of their work setting.

    Read The Burnout Divide: Examining Stressors and Solutions in Diverse Workplaces

Sustainability/Stephanie La

Green AI: The Role of AI in Sustainability

Green AI emphasizes the importance of balancing innovation with environmental responsibility, addressing the significant environmental and ethical challenges posed by AI development, such as high carbon emissions, energy consumption, and data privacy concerns. While AI offers transformative benefits, including climate change prediction, pollution monitoring, and public health insights, its rapid advancement often prioritizes speed over sustainability. By adopting Green AI practices—such as energy-efficient algorithms, renewable energy sources, and sustainable development goals—organizations can reduce their environmental impact, align with sustainability objectives, and foster long-term growth while contributing to a more sustainable and equitable future.

Learn more
Learn more about Green AI: The Role of AI in Sustainability

Leadership/Melissa Sumnauth

The Importance of Pronouncing a Name: An Act of Inclusive Leadership

Names are not just labels; they are powerful reflections of identity, culture, and history. In this article, Melissa Sumnauth explores the significance of correct name pronunciation in leadership and organizational culture. Drawing on her experience in executive coaching, executive search, facilitation, and people & culture she illustrates how mispronunciation can function as a microaggression and a barrier to inclusion, while intentional effort to say names correctly fosters dignity, belonging, and trust. With practical tools and a call to action for leaders, this article reframes name pronunciation as a vital practice in advancing equity and respectful engagement.

Learn more
Learn more about The Importance of Pronouncing a Name: An Act of Inclusive Leadership