National Indigenous History Month as a Mirror rather than a Museum

Indigenous Knowledge

This reflection piece argues that National Indigenous History Month should be an opportunity not only to deepen our understanding of history, but also to examine how it shapes our everyday choices.

Organizations we partner with

Bata Shoe Museum, Canadian Council for the Arts, CEE Centre for Young Black Professionals, City of Toronto, David Suzuki Foundation, Fasken, Genome Canada, George Brown College, GTAA, Humber, IMCO, Kids Help Phone, Luminato, McMaster University, MLSE, OICR, Ontario Presents, ROM, Sankofa Square, Sick Kids, TD Bank, TTC, UHN Foundation, United Way Greater Toronto, University of Toronto, University of Waterloo, University Pension Plan Ontario, York University

Clients Served Include

Every June, National Indigenous History Month encourages Canadians to learn more about the histories, cultures, and contributions of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Peoples. Organizations host events, individuals share articles, and social media fills up with acknowledgments around the importance of learning about the past. These efforts are valuable, for sure, particularly since so much of Indigenous history has been absent from mainstream education and public discourse; however, I’ve often wondered whether many of us approach this month in ways that unintentionally create distance between ourselves and the very history we’re seeking to learn from.

As I’ve observed many allies, non-Indigenous people, and organizations over the past month, and as I reflect on the past 30 days as an ally myself, I find myself fixated on the notion of a museum on the one hand and a mirror on the other. To be more clear, we often treat history like it were a museum—when we visit a museum, we observe, read descriptions, examine artifacts, and leave it having learned something new. The experience is inherently external as we stand outside of it or in front of the exhibits looking in. The stories belong to another time and to other people. Put another way, the stories inform us, but they don’t implicate us.

A mirror serves an entirely different purpose. A mirror doesn’t just ask us to observe; it asks us to reflect. Standing before a mirror inevitably prompts questions about ourselves: How do I appear? What am I contributing? What responsibilities do I carry? If history functioned more like a mirror rather than a museum, National Indigenous History Month would become something more than an opportunity to increase our knowledge—it would become an opportunity to examine ourselves.

 This distinction matters because reconciliation is ultimately about relationships in action, not simply information gathering. Knowledge, while essential, can’t be the destination. It is the starting point from which reflection and action must emerge. The purpose of learning history shouldn’t just be to better understand the past; it should be to better inform the choices we make in the present.

 Perhaps this is why I have become less focused on exploring or understanding what Canadians learned during National Indigenous History Month and more interested in asking what and how people changed because of it. Did our understanding alter the way we approached a difficult conversation? Did it influence who was invited into a decision-making process? Did it encourage greater humility, curiosity, or accountability? If the answer is no for you, the reader, then I would say—respectfully, and with love, as these are the only places I ever want to express from—that history is something you consume rather than something you let change you in any material way. 

Quite literally, every generation contributes to the history that future generations end up inheriting. This means that long after this month's commemorations have ended, today's decisions will become tomorrow's historical record. Future Canadians won’t only study the policies that governments adopted or the public statements organizations issued, they’ll also consider whether people recognized their responsibilities at the individual level and acted upon them.

National Indigenous History Month, therefore, offers an invitation that extends beyond remembrance. It challenges each of us to consider not only what we know about the past, but how we’re allowing that knowledge to shape the future. And so if history were a museum, it would ask us to look carefully at what came before us and, if history were a mirror (which I believe it should be), it would ask a more difficult question: When future generations look back at this moment in time, what will your choices say about the person they’ll perceive you to have been?

President and Managing Partner

Add a comment

This will be publicly visible.

Your email address will not be published.

Your comment will be reviewed by an admin before it is published.

Related Posts

Continue exploring practical insights and perspectives from the BES team.

  • EDIA / Jason Murray

    A Defence of EDIA: Speaking Points for Advocates Looking to Defend the Work

    As public discourse grows more polarized and organizations face pressure to retreat from equity commitments, leaders must be prepared to speak clearly and practically about the value of Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (EDIA). This article offers a strategic reframing of EDIA—not as a moral obligation, but as an essential operating discipline. It provides decision-makers with language to defend the work, insights to ground it in daily practice, and a reminder that EDIA, when done well, is not only ethically sound—it is operationally wise.

    Read A Defence of EDIA: Speaking Points for Advocates Looking to Defend the Work
  • Future of Work / Helen Mekonen

    Bridging Generations: Three Fun and Creative Ways to Foster Cross-Generational Collaboration

    Generational diversity is one of the most valuable assets in today’s workplace, bringing together unique perspectives, experiences, and strengths from Baby Boomers, Gen Xers, Millennials, and Gen Zers. However, leveraging this diversity isn’t always straightforward, as stereotypes and misunderstandings can hinder collaboration. To bridge these generational divides, organizations can implement creative strategies like generational “Show-and-Tell” sessions, reverse innovation workshops, and two-way learning exchanges. These activities foster connection, mutual respect, and a culture of inclusivity, enabling teams to unlock innovation and build stronger relationships. By embracing the contributions of every generation, organizations can create thriving workplaces where everyone feels valued and empowered to succeed.

    Read Bridging Generations: Three Fun and Creative Ways to Foster Cross-Generational Collaboration
  • Industry Trends / Jason Murray

    Beyond the Org Chart (Part I): Critical Questions Leaders Must Ask During Onboarding

    The early days of an executive’s tenure are filled with promise and pressure—it’s a time of introductions, immersion, and inevitable information overload. While most onboarding processes focus on organizational charts, strategic priorities, and compliance, the most successful leaders know that the real work lies beyond what's written down. They understand that every organization—no matter how structured on paper—has its own ecosystem of relationships, histories, and unspoken truths. This article outlines two critical questions new leaders must ask to decode the visible and invisible dynamics that shape organizations—and to lead with clarity, integrity, and inclusion.

    Read Beyond the Org Chart (Part I): Critical Questions Leaders Must Ask During Onboarding
  • Leadership / Melissa Sumnauth

    Perfectionism vs. Good Enough: Leading with Progress over Perfection

    Perfectionism begins with a lie—that we are not enough as we are. It can paralyze leaders and organizations, stalling projects, delaying decisions, and undermining authentic voices. Yet perfectionism is not inevitable. Leaders can choose tools and practices that shift the focus from flawlessness to meaningful progress. The 80/20 Rule helps clarify where to invest energy for greatest impact. The Eisenhower Matrix trains attention on what truly matters, not just what feels urgent. Agile approaches remind us to learn through action rather than cling to rigid plans. Beyond frameworks, perfectionism also intersects with systems of oppression, amplifying the weight carried by equity-deserving groups. Naming this systemic critic allows us to challenge its power and move toward our inner champion: a voice of resilience, balance, and authenticity.

    Read Perfectionism vs. Good Enough: Leading with Progress over Perfection

Indigenous Knowledge/Jason Murray

National Indigenous History Month as a Mirror rather than a Museum

This reflection piece argues that National Indigenous History Month should be an opportunity not only to deepen our understanding of history, but also to examine how it shapes our everyday choices.

Learn more
Learn more about National Indigenous History Month as a Mirror rather than a Museum

Sustainability/Stephanie La

Green AI: The Role of AI in Sustainability

Green AI emphasizes the importance of balancing innovation with environmental responsibility, addressing the significant environmental and ethical challenges posed by AI development, such as high carbon emissions, energy consumption, and data privacy concerns. While AI offers transformative benefits, including climate change prediction, pollution monitoring, and public health insights, its rapid advancement often prioritizes speed over sustainability. By adopting Green AI practices—such as energy-efficient algorithms, renewable energy sources, and sustainable development goals—organizations can reduce their environmental impact, align with sustainability objectives, and foster long-term growth while contributing to a more sustainable and equitable future.

Learn more
Learn more about Green AI: The Role of AI in Sustainability