
National Indigenous History Month as a Mirror rather than a Museum
Indigenous Knowledge
This reflection piece argues that National Indigenous History Month should be an opportunity not only to deepen our understanding of history, but also to examine how it shapes our everyday choices.
Organizations we partner with
Bata Shoe Museum, Canadian Council for the Arts, CEE Centre for Young Black Professionals, City of Toronto, David Suzuki Foundation, Fasken, Genome Canada, George Brown College, GTAA, Humber, IMCO, Kids Help Phone, Luminato, McMaster University, MLSE, OICR, Ontario Presents, ROM, Sankofa Square, Sick Kids, TD Bank, TTC, UHN Foundation, United Way Greater Toronto, University of Toronto, University of Waterloo, University Pension Plan Ontario, York University
Clients Served Include
Every June, National Indigenous History Month encourages Canadians to learn more about the histories, cultures, and contributions of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Peoples. Organizations host events, individuals share articles, and social media fills up with acknowledgments around the importance of learning about the past. These efforts are valuable, for sure, particularly since so much of Indigenous history has been absent from mainstream education and public discourse; however, I’ve often wondered whether many of us approach this month in ways that unintentionally create distance between ourselves and the very history we’re seeking to learn from.
As I’ve observed many allies, non-Indigenous people, and organizations over the past month, and as I reflect on the past 30 days as an ally myself, I find myself fixated on the notion of a museum on the one hand and a mirror on the other. To be more clear, we often treat history like it were a museum—when we visit a museum, we observe, read descriptions, examine artifacts, and leave it having learned something new. The experience is inherently external as we stand outside of it or in front of the exhibits looking in. The stories belong to another time and to other people. Put another way, the stories inform us, but they don’t implicate us.
A mirror serves an entirely different purpose. A mirror doesn’t just ask us to observe; it asks us to reflect. Standing before a mirror inevitably prompts questions about ourselves: How do I appear? What am I contributing? What responsibilities do I carry? If history functioned more like a mirror rather than a museum, National Indigenous History Month would become something more than an opportunity to increase our knowledge—it would become an opportunity to examine ourselves.
This distinction matters because reconciliation is ultimately about relationships in action, not simply information gathering. Knowledge, while essential, can’t be the destination. It is the starting point from which reflection and action must emerge. The purpose of learning history shouldn’t just be to better understand the past; it should be to better inform the choices we make in the present.
Perhaps this is why I have become less focused on exploring or understanding what Canadians learned during National Indigenous History Month and more interested in asking what and how people changed because of it. Did our understanding alter the way we approached a difficult conversation? Did it influence who was invited into a decision-making process? Did it encourage greater humility, curiosity, or accountability? If the answer is no for you, the reader, then I would say—respectfully, and with love, as these are the only places I ever want to express from—that history is something you consume rather than something you let change you in any material way.
Quite literally, every generation contributes to the history that future generations end up inheriting. This means that long after this month's commemorations have ended, today's decisions will become tomorrow's historical record. Future Canadians won’t only study the policies that governments adopted or the public statements organizations issued, they’ll also consider whether people recognized their responsibilities at the individual level and acted upon them.
National Indigenous History Month, therefore, offers an invitation that extends beyond remembrance. It challenges each of us to consider not only what we know about the past, but how we’re allowing that knowledge to shape the future. And so if history were a museum, it would ask us to look carefully at what came before us and, if history were a mirror (which I believe it should be), it would ask a more difficult question: When future generations look back at this moment in time, what will your choices say about the person they’ll perceive you to have been?

President and Managing Partner
Add a comment
This will be publicly visible.
Your email address will not be published.
Your comment will be reviewed by an admin before it is published.
Read Leading with Compassion in the AI Era: Fostering Human-Centred Leadership in a Digital World
Leadership / Urmilla Mahabirsingh
Leading with Compassion in the AI Era: Fostering Human-Centred Leadership in a Digital World
Leadership in the AI era demands more than driving efficiency and innovation—it requires a deep commitment to the human element. As AI transforms industries, leaders face the challenge of guiding their teams through uncertainty, adapting to new roles, and addressing anxieties about rapid change. Compassionate leadership, centred on emotional intelligence, empathy, and inclusivity, bridges the gap between technology and humanity. By prioritizing mental health, fostering trust, and empowering employees through learning, leaders can create workplaces where technology enhances human potential rather than replacing it. In this era of transformation, it is the compassionate leader who will define a future where progress and people thrive together.
Read Redefining Work: Navigating Hybrid Models in a Post-Pandemic World
Industry Trends / Chad Martin Lawrence
Redefining Work: Navigating Hybrid Models in a Post-Pandemic World
The hybrid work model has emerged as a transformative response to the evolving demands of the modern workplace, blending flexibility with operational goals to redefine how and where work gets done. By offering employees autonomy while fostering inclusivity, hybrid work enhances job satisfaction, supports diverse needs, and helps attract and retain top talent. However, its success depends on intentional strategies that address equity, engagement, and collaboration challenges. Organizations that embrace hybrid work as more than a logistical solution—embedding Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (EDIA) principles and prioritizing connection and purpose—can cultivate resilient, high-performing teams and a thriving workplace culture fit for the future of work.
Read Reading the Room: How Chairs Steer Committees Toward Stronger Hires
Industry Trends / Jason Murray
Reading the Room: How Chairs Steer Committees Toward Stronger Hires
In this article, Jason Murray explores the nuanced dynamics that can shape hiring outcomes when search committees are involved. He outlines practical strategies for Hiring Managers and Committee Chairs to cultivate structure, promote balanced participation, and avoid common pitfalls. Drawing from years of experience in executive search, Jason offers tools to help leaders ‘read the room’ and ensure that decision-making processes lead to thoughtful, equitable, and successful hires.
Read The Burnout Divide: Examining Stressors and Solutions in Diverse Workplaces
HR Corner / Stephanie La
The Burnout Divide: Examining Stressors and Solutions in Diverse Workplaces
Workspaces today—whether onsite, remote, or hybrid—present unique challenges that contribute to stress and burnout among employees. Onsite workers often face high-pressure environments and struggle with work-life balance, compounded by the need for visible productivity. Remote workers, while enjoying flexibility, grapple with blurred boundaries, extended working hours, and isolation from colleagues. Hybrid models blend flexibility and connection but still require careful structuring to address employee needs. The key to mitigating burnout lies not in choosing a specific work model but in fostering a supportive environment tailored to diverse employee experiences. By offering mental health resources, promoting clear boundaries, and encouraging open communication, organizations can prioritize well-being and create a workplace where employees thrive, regardless of their work setting.

Indigenous Knowledge/Jason Murray
National Indigenous History Month as a Mirror rather than a Museum
This reflection piece argues that National Indigenous History Month should be an opportunity not only to deepen our understanding of history, but also to examine how it shapes our everyday choices.

Sustainability/Stephanie La
Green AI: The Role of AI in Sustainability
Green AI emphasizes the importance of balancing innovation with environmental responsibility, addressing the significant environmental and ethical challenges posed by AI development, such as high carbon emissions, energy consumption, and data privacy concerns. While AI offers transformative benefits, including climate change prediction, pollution monitoring, and public health insights, its rapid advancement often prioritizes speed over sustainability. By adopting Green AI practices—such as energy-efficient algorithms, renewable energy sources, and sustainable development goals—organizations can reduce their environmental impact, align with sustainability objectives, and foster long-term growth while contributing to a more sustainable and equitable future.